But I naturally tend towards making a ton of new assumptions, and then reacting emotionally based on those new assumptions. When I don't have all the information, I assume the worst and react based on that assumption. Makes no sense.
On a somewhat related note, I wanted to relate something I've learned over the past few weeks, relationship-wise. Over-thinking relationships can be the death of them. (Or suffocate them before they can even start. Kinda like the seeds sown in the weeds in Mark 4:3-9)
Here's what I mean. To myself, I am a very persuasive person. In the same way I convince myself that a slew of new assumptions are true, I can convince myself that pretty much anything I don't know much about is true. I can also pretty much talk myself out of anything.
Especially in Provo (maybe all of Utah?), I think the thought pattern goes like this: (feel free to change the gender, because it goes both ways)
"I dunno, I think I kinda like her. But I still don't really know. I should keep dating around to see if she's really the one for me."
"Yeah, I don't know that I'm really super interested in her."
"She's not really my type."
These thoughts, in my opinion, are really just ways to think yourself out of having a relationship that could potentially become something very meaningful. I think part of it also assumes that the "commitment gap" (as I'll call it) between (1) going on dates, (2) dating exclusively, and (3) being engaged are something like this:
(1) ----------- (2) ----------- (3)
Where it is as big a commitment to move from 1 to 2 as it is to move from 2 to 3.
What?!
I mean, maybe we don't consciously think that, but I for one sure act like it. "I don't know if I'm super interested in her." (So... really you're thinking 'why take the huge irreversible step (note the sarcasm) to date her exclusively to find out how interested I am?' Is that what I am really thinking?) "She's not really my type." (How do you know? You've only ever gone after the same kind of person before!)
The gap is truly more like this:
(1) -- (2) ------------------------- (3)
Moral of the story: don't avoid getting into a relationship because it may not work out. Doing so is basically like saying you will only date exclusively the person you fully intend to marry. And then how do you gain experience?
My first philosophy: if I'm not interested after the 1st date, I probably won't ask her out again.
My last philosophy: always go on a second date and keep an open mind. First dates are bad for really getting to know someone
My newest philosophy: just freaking date people! Obviously if there are red flags, then don't go there. But if you're honestly not sure, I say just go for it! The worst thing that could happen is you find out you're not really that interested, and you break up and move on. Isn't that basically the definition of dating before marriage? You learn facts about people on the first few dates. You don't really get to know the person until a pretty substantial amount of time (and maybe even a certain level of commitment?) is spent with them.
If you think too hard about it, you'll probably talk yourself out of it. And maybe even out of feelings you once had for someone.
Believe me. It happens. Unfortunately.
Bob, this is BRILLIANT! I agree, in our Utah or BYU culture (whatever you wanna call it) we're so convinced we can reach marriage or serious commitment without risk and experience. Maybe for some people it works that way, but not really. I like what you said at the end: "just freaking date people!"
ReplyDeleteHear, hear.
AMEN my friend. AMEN.
ReplyDelete